Perioperative glycaemic control for people with diabetes undergoing surgery.

BACKGROUND: People with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of postoperative complications. Data from randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses point to a potential benefit of intensive glycaemic control, targeting near-normal blood glucose, in people with hyperglycaemia (with and without diabetes mellitus) being submitted for surgical procedures. However, there is limited evidence concerning this question in people with diabetes mellitus undergoing surgery. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of perioperative glycaemic control for people with diabetes undergoing surgery. SEARCH METHODS: For this update, we searched the databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE, LILACS, WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of last search for all databases was 25 July 2022. We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that prespecified different targets of perioperative glycaemic control for participants with diabetes (intensive versus conventional or standard care). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, hypoglycaemic events and infectious complications. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular events, renal failure, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, health-related quality of life, socioeconomic effects, weight gain and mean blood glucose during the intervention. We summarised studies using meta-analysis with a random-effects model and calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, using a 95% confidence interval (CI), or summarised outcomes with descriptive methods. We used the GRADE approach to evaluate the certainty of the evidence (CoE). MAIN RESULTS: A total of eight additional studies were added to the 12 included studies in the previous review leading to 20 RCTs included in this update. A total of 2670 participants were randomised, of which 1320 were allocated to the intensive treatment group and 1350 to the comparison group. The duration of the intervention varied from during surgery to five days postoperative. No included trial had an overall low risk of bias. Intensive glycaemic control resulted in little or no difference in all-cause mortality compared to conventional glycaemic control (130/1263 (10.3%) and 117/1288 (9.1%) events, RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.33; I2 = 0%; 2551 participants, 18 studies; high CoE). Hypoglycaemic events, both severe and non-severe, were mainly experienced in the intensive glycaemic control group. Intensive glycaemic control may slightly increase hypoglycaemic events compared to conventional glycaemic control (141/1184 (11.9%) and 41/1226 (3.3%) events, RR 3.36, 95% CI 1.69 to 6.67; I2 = 64%; 2410 participants, 17 studies; low CoE), as well as those considered severe events (37/927 (4.0%) and 6/969 (0.6%), RR 4.73, 95% CI 2.12 to 10.55; I2 = 0%; 1896 participants, 11 studies; low CoE). Intensive glycaemic control, compared to conventional glycaemic control, may result in little to no difference in the rate of infectious complications (160/1228 (13.0%) versus 224/1225 (18.2%) events, RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.04; P = 0.09; I2 = 55%; 2453 participants, 18 studies; low CoE). Analysis of the predefined secondary outcomes revealed that intensive glycaemic control may result in a decrease in cardiovascular events compared to conventional glycaemic control (107/955 (11.2%) versus 125/978 (12.7%) events, RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.97; P = 0.03; I2 = 44%; 1454 participants, 12 studies; low CoE). Further, intensive glycaemic control resulted in little or no difference in renal failure events compared to conventional glycaemic control (137/1029 (13.3%) and 158/1057 (14.9%), RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.22; P = 0.56; I2 = 38%; 2086 participants, 14 studies; low CoE). We found little to no difference between intensive glycaemic control and conventional glycaemic control in length of ICU stay (MD -0.10 days, 95% CI -0.57 to 0.38; P = 0.69; I2 = 69%; 1687 participants, 11 studies; low CoE), and length of hospital stay (MD -0.79 days, 95% CI -1.79 to 0.21; P = 0.12; I2 = 77%; 1520 participants, 12 studies; very low CoE). Due to the differences within included studies, we did not pool data for the reduction of mean blood glucose. Intensive glycaemic control resulted in a mean lowering of blood glucose, ranging from 13.42 mg/dL to 91.30 mg/dL. One trial assessed health-related quality of life in 12/37 participants in the intensive glycaemic control group, and 13/44 participants in the conventional glycaemic control group; no important difference was shown in the measured physical health composite score of the short-form 12-item health survey (SF-12). One substudy reported a cost analysis of the population of an included study showing a higher total hospital cost in the conventional glycaemic control group, USD 42,052 (32,858 to 56,421) compared to the intensive glycaemic control group, USD 40,884 (31.216 to 49,992). It is important to point out that there is relevant heterogeneity between studies for several outcomes. We identified two ongoing trials. The results of these studies could add new information in future updates on this topic. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: High-certainty evidence indicates that perioperative intensive glycaemic control in people with diabetes undergoing surgery does not reduce all-cause mortality compared to conventional glycaemic control. There is low-certainty evidence that intensive glycaemic control may reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, but cause little to no difference to the risk of infectious complications after the intervention, while it may increase the risk of hypoglycaemia. There are no clear differences between the groups for the other outcomes. There are uncertainties among the intensive and conventional groups regarding the optimal glycaemic algorithm and target blood glucose concentrations. In addition, we found poor data on health-related quality of life, socio-economic effects and weight gain. It is also relevant to underline the heterogeneity among studies regarding clinical outcomes and methodological approaches. More studies are needed that consider these factors and provide a higher quality of evidence, especially for outcomes such as hypoglycaemia and infectious complications.

Epidemiology of the first-ever cardiovascular event in people with type 1 diabetes: a retrospective cohort population-based study in Catalonia.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the characteristics of first-ever cardiovascular events in type 1 diabetes may impact primary prevention strategies. This study describes the first-ever manifestation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Catalonia (Spain) and evaluates differences according to age and sex. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with T1D > 30 years without CVD before 2010 registered in the SIDIAP database. The occurrence of a first cardiovascular event up to the end of 2016, the type of CV event and associations with baseline characteristics were analysed. RESULTS: Of 8412 patients, 884 suffered a first CV event (incidence rate 1.62 per 100 persons-years). Overall, peripheral vascular disease (39.5%) was the most frequent event. We observed a higher proportion of heart failure in women (21.7%) than in men (10.1%). In women, heart failure was the most frequent event in those > 65 years (40.5%). Decreased glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio [HR] 5.42 [95% CI 4.32;6.80]), elevated albumin/creatinine ratio (HR 3.39 [95% CI [2.47;4.66], microvascular complications (HR 3.27 [95% CI 2.85;3.75]), and hypertension (HR 3.21 [95% CI [2.80;3.67]) were most strongly associated with a first CV event. HbA1c > 7.0% was associated with incident CVD only in patients aged < 55/60 years. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral artery disease in the whole cohort, and heart failure in elder subjects are the most frequent first-ever CVD events in T1D in our region. These findings deserve to be taken into account when considering primary prevention measures and when estimating CV risk in people with T1D.

Obesity and related comorbidities in a large population-based cohort of subjects with type 1 diabetes in Catalonia.

Introduction: Obesity, an increasing global health problem, can affect people with other disease conditions. The prevalence of obesity in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is not well known. The aim of this study was to describe extensively the characteristics and prevalence of different classes of obesity according to BMI (body mass index) categories in a large cohort of patients with T1D. Material and methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study in Catalonia. We reviewed all patients with T1D diagnosis, ≥ 18 years old and with BMI data from the SIDIAP database. Sociodemographic and clinical data, cardiovascular risk factors, laboratory parameters and concomitant medications were collected. Results: A total of 6,068 patients with T1D were analyzed. The prevalence of obesity in the total sample was 18% (13.8% with class 1 obesity [BMI 30-34.9 kg/m2]). Patients with obesity had a higher prevalence of other cardiovascular risk factors (i.e. hypertension was 61.4% vs. 37.5%; dyslipidemia 63.6% vs 44%, and chronic kidney disease 38.4% vs. 24.4%; p<0.001 in all cases) and poorer control of them. The higher prevalence was regardless of sex, age and duration of diabetes. The increase in these comorbidities was noticeable from a BMI > 25 kg/m2. Patients with obesity did not have poorer glycemic control. Conclusion: The presence of obesity in people with T1D is frequent and cardiovascular risk factors are more common and more poorly controlled in T1D patients with obesity.

Comorbid autoimmune diseases and burden of diabetes-related complications in patients with type 1 diabetes from a Mediterranean area.

AIM: To assess the prevalence of autoimmune diseases (AID) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to evaluate whether the rate of diabetes-related complications differs depending on the presence of AID. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of 13,570 T1D patients aged ≥ 18 years registered in the SIDIAP database. The association between AID and diabetes-related complications was assessed by multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: The prevalence of AID was 18.3% with thyroid AID being the most common. Patients with T1D and AID were more often female and their current age, age of diabetes onset and diabetes duration were higher. Patients with only thyroid AID experienced a lower risk of peripheral artery disease (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, 95%; confidence interval [CI] 0.31 to 0.81) and kidney disease (OR = 0.68, 95%; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.85), whereas patients with other AID had an increased risk of ischemic heart disease (OR = 1.48, 95%; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.06). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of diabetes-related complications in patients with T1D differs according to the type of additional AID. The presence of diabetes complications is lower in those with autoimmune thyroid disease while the presence of other AID is associated with higher rates of ischemic heart disease.

Clinical Characteristics and Degree of Glycemic and Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes in Catalonia (Spain).

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics, complications, degree of glycemic control, and cardiovascular risk factor control in patients with type 1 diabetes in Catalonia (Northwest of Spain). METHODS: Cross-sectional study using a database including clinical, laboratory, and treatment data. Patients with an ICD10 diagnosis of type 1 diabetes were included, excluding those treated with glucose-lowering agents other than insulin, or treated only with basal insulin two years after diagnosis. RESULTS: 15,008 patients were analysed. Median IQR age was 42 (31-53) years, diabetes duration 11.8 (6.8-16.0) years, 56.5% men. Median (IQR) HbA1c was 7.9% (7.1-8.8). Microvascular complications were present in 24.4% of patients, 43.6% in those with a diabetes duration >19 years. In presence of known cardiovascular disease 69.3% of patients showed an LDL-C concentration >70 mg/dL, 37% had a systolic blood pressure >135 mmHg and 22.4% were smokers. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a reliable snapshot about the clinical situation of a large population of patients with T1D in Catalonia, which is similar to that of other western areas. The lack of adequate control of cardiovascular risk factors in a significant proportion of patients with cardiovascular disease deserves a more detailed analysis and urges the need for improvement strategies.

Presence of risk factors for thyroid cancer does not improve the performance of ultrasound screening for thyroid nodules in patients with obesity.

PURPOSE: It has been suggested, on a theoretical basis, that ultrasound screening of thyroid nodules in obese patients with additional risk factors (family history, chronic autoimmune thyroiditis or high thyrotropin) might be cost-effective for the early detection and treatment of thyroid cancer. The present study evaluates if this approach can be validated in a real clinical setting. METHODS: Patients with obesity who attended hospital-based clinics were evaluated for risk factors of thyroid cancer and ultrasound screened for thyroid nodularity. Detected nodules were evaluated according to current guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 429 patients were evaluated (70.2% women, mean age 49.1 ± 11.0, mean body mass index 42.6 ± 5.8 kg/m2 ). Risk factors were present in 129 (30.1%) patients. Thyroid nodules with indication for fine-needle aspiration biopsy were detected in 69 (16.1%). We did not find differences in the risk of harbouring thyroid nodules according to the presence of risk factors (no risk factors 16.6%, risk factors 14.1%, P = .64). No single risk factor conferred an increased risk for thyroid nodules During the screening procedure, four cases of thyroid cancer were detected, none of them with the evaluated risk factors. CONCLUSION: The presence of known risk factors for thyroid cancer does not improve the performance of a US screening strategy aimed at the detection of thyroid nodules in obese patients. According to current guidelines, screening for thyroid nodules in obese patients is not recommended regardless of the presence of thyroid cancer risk factors.

Escleredema diabeticorum: descripción de 11 casos / Scleredema diabeticorum: Description of 11 cases

No disponible

Evaluación de la aplicación de un protocolo de cribado nutricional en pacientes ingresados en el Servicio de Medicina de un hospital comarcal / Assessing the implementation of a nutritional screening protocol in patients admitted to the Medicine Department of a local hospital

Antecedentes: las técnicas de cribado e intervención nutricional en pacientes hospitalizados son una medida coste-efectiva. En la práctica clínica, el problema radica en cómo aplicarlas. Objetivo: evaluar la aplicación de un protocolo de cribado nutricional en pacientes hospitalizados en la Planta de Medicina (M). Material y métodos: estudio unicéntrico, prospectivo y observacional realizado a pacientes que ingresan en M. Los criterios de exclusión fueron: pacientes oncológicos en fase terminal, ingresos inferiores a 72 h y reingresos de pacientes previamente incluidos. Se seleccionaron 1 de cada 2 ingresos. Se evaluaron: si Enfermería había realizado el test de cribado, el Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ); la puntuación obtenida; las interconsultas a dietistas (ICD); el soporte nutricional prescrito, y el diagnóstico de desnutrición en el informe de alta. Los dietistas volvieron a administrar el SNAQ a 1 de cada 3 pacientes incluidos. Resultados: durante el periodo de estudio ingresaron 726 pacientes, se seleccionaron 377 y se incluyeron 315. Enfermería administró el SNAQ al 93,6% de los pacientes; presentaban desnutrición el 19%. La determinación realizada por los dietistas detectó un 37,8% de desnutrición. En el 41,9% de los que presentaban desnutrición severa se realizaron ICD; al 40% de ellos no se les realizó ninguna intervención nutricional, y el diagnóstico de desnutrición constaba en el informe de alta del 42,1% de los pacientes. Conclusión: existe un buen cumplimiento en la realización del test de cribado, pero existe también discordancia con la valoración de los dietistas. En la mayoría de los pacientes con desnutrición no se realizan ICD, no se prescribe soporte nutricional y no se hace constar el diagnóstico en el informe de alta

Background: the techniques for screening and nutritional intervention in hospitalized patients are a cost-effective measure. In clinical practice the problem lies in their administration. Objective: to evaluate the implementation of a nutritional screening tool in patients admitted to our Medicine Ward (M). Material and methods: a single-center, prospective, observational study in patients admitted to M. Exclusion criteria: end-stage cancer patients, inpatient stay less than 72 h, and hospital readmission of previously included patients. One out of every 2 hospital admissions was selected. We assessed the following: whether nurses performed the screening test, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ); the score obtained; consultations with dieticians (ICD); prescribed nutritional support; and coding of malnutrition in the discharge report. Dieticians repeated the SNAQ for one in every 3 patients. Results: during the study period 726 patients were admitted, 377 were selected, and 315 were included. The nursing staff administered the SNAQ to 93.6 % of patients and malnutrition was present in 19 %. Dieticians detected malnutrition in 37.8 %. In 41.9 % of patients with severe malnutrition an ICD was performed, whereas in 40 % of them no nutritional intervention was implemented. The diagnosis of malnutrition was recorded in the discharge report of 42.1 % of our cases. Conclusion: Compliance with screening test administration was good, but there is disagreement with the assessment made by dieticians. For most malnourished patients nutritional support fals to be prescribed, no ICDs are performed, and a malnutrition diagnosis is not included in the discharge report

Are YouTube videos useful for patient self-education in type 2 diabetes?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of YouTube videos as an educative tool for type 2 diabetes self-management. DESIGN: Search terms were "diabetes diet" and "diabetes treatment." Videos were jointly assessed by two reviewers. A third investigator evaluated a random sample to check for agreement. MAIN MEASURES: Usefulness defined as making reference to AAD7 Self-Care Behaviors™ and presence of misleading information. RESULTS: Of the 393 videos included, 42.2 percent (n = 166) classified as "alternative medicine." 40.2 percent (n = 158) contained useful information. 25.7 percent (n = 101) videos contained misleading information. Videos displaying "alternative medicine" professionals (60 out of 200) were less useful (17% vs 57%; p < 0.001) and more misleading (40% vs 2%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The probability of finding videos that relate to AADE7™ self-care behaviors is below 50 percent. The odds of finding misleading information are high. Therefore, it is inadvisable for professionals to recommend the use of YouTube as an educating tool if specific videos are not suggested.

[Assessing the implementation of a nutritional screening protocol in patients admitted to the Medicine Department of a local hospital]. / Evaluación de la aplicación de un protocolo de cribado nutricional en pacientes ingresados en el Servicio de Medicina de un hospital comarcal.

INTRODUCTION: Background: the techniques for screening and nutritional intervention in hospitalized patients are a cost-effective measure. In clinical practice the problem lies in their administration. Objective: to evaluate the implementation of a nutritional screening tool in patients admitted to our Medicine Ward (M). Material and methods: a single-center, prospective, observational study in patients admitted to M. Exclusion criteria: end-stage cancer patients, inpatient stay less than 72 h, and hospital readmission of previously included patients. One out of every 2 hospital admissions was selected. We assessed the following: whether nurses performed the screening test, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ); the score obtained; consultations with dieticians (ICD); prescribed nutritional support; and coding of malnutrition in the discharge report. Dieticians repeated the SNAQ for one in every 3 patients. Results: during the study period 726 patients were admitted, 377 were selected, and 315 were included. The nursing staff administered the SNAQ to 93.6% of patients and malnutrition was present in 19%. Dieticians detected malnutrition in 37.8%. In 41.9% of patients with severe malnutrition an ICD was performed, whereas in 40% of them no nutritional intervention was implemented. The diagnosis of malnutrition was recorded in the discharge report of 42.1% of our cases. Conclusion: Compliance with screening test administration was good, but there is disagreement with the assessment made by dieticians. For most malnourished patients nutritional support fals to be prescribed, no ICDs are performed, and a malnutrition diagnosis is not included in the discharge report.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Antecedentes: las técnicas de cribado e intervención nutricional en pacientes hospitalizados son una medida coste-efectiva. En la práctica clínica, el problema radica en cómo aplicarlas. Objetivo: evaluar la aplicación de un protocolo de cribado nutricional en pacientes hospitalizados en la Planta de Medicina (M). Material y métodos: estudio unicéntrico, prospectivo y observacional realizado a pacientes que ingresan en M. Los criterios de exclusión fueron: pacientes oncológicos en fase terminal, ingresos inferiores a 72 h y reingresos de pacientes previamente incluidos. Se seleccionaron 1 de cada 2 ingresos. Se evaluaron: si Enfermería había realizado el test de cribado, el Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ); la puntuación obtenida; las interconsultas a dietistas (ICD); el soporte nutricional prescrito, y el diagnóstico de desnutrición en el informe de alta. Los dietistas volvieron a administrar el SNAQ a 1 de cada 3 pacientes incluidos. Resultados: durante el periodo de estudio ingresaron 726 pacientes, se seleccionaron 377 y se incluyeron 315. Enfermería administró el SNAQ al 93,6% de los pacientes; presentaban desnutrición el 19%. La determinación realizada por los dietistas detectó un 37,8% de desnutrición. En el 41,9% de los que presentaban desnutrición severa se realizaron ICD; al 40% de ellos no se les realizó ninguna intervención nutricional, y el diagnóstico de desnutrición constaba en el informe de alta del 42,1% de los pacientes. Conclusión: existe un buen cumplimiento en la realización del test de cribado, pero existe también discordancia con la valoración de los dietistas. En la mayoría de los pacientes con desnutrición no se realizan ICD, no se prescribe soporte nutricional y no se hace constar el diagnóstico en el informe de alta.

Diet, physical activity or both for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications in people at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The projected rise in the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) could develop into a substantial health problem worldwide. Whether diet, physical activity or both can prevent or delay T2DM and its associated complications in at-risk people is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of diet, physical activity or both on the prevention or delay of T2DM and its associated complications in people at increased risk of developing T2DM. SEARCH METHODS: This is an update of the Cochrane Review published in 2008. We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP Search Portal and reference lists of systematic reviews, articles and health technology assessment reports. The date of the last search of all databases was January 2017. We continuously used a MEDLINE email alert service to identify newly published studies using the same search strategy as described for MEDLINE up to September 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a duration of two years or more. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology for data collection and analysis. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 12 RCTs randomising 5238 people. One trial contributed 41% of all participants. The duration of the interventions varied from two to six years. We judged none of the included trials at low risk of bias for all 'Risk of bias' domains.Eleven trials compared diet plus physical activity with standard or no treatment. Nine RCTs included participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), one RCT included participants with IGT, impaired fasting blood glucose (IFG) or both, and one RCT included people with fasting glucose levels between 5.3 to 6.9 mmol/L. A total of 12 deaths occurred in 2049 participants in the diet plus physical activity groups compared with 10 in 2050 participants in the comparator groups (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.50; 95% prediction interval 0.44 to 2.88; 4099 participants, 10 trials; very low-quality evidence). The definition of T2DM incidence varied among the included trials. Altogether 315 of 2122 diet plus physical activity participants (14.8%) developed T2DM compared with 614 of 2389 comparator participants (25.7%) (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.64; 95% prediction interval 0.50 to 0.65; 4511 participants, 11 trials; moderate-quality evidence). Two trials reported serious adverse events. In one trial no adverse events occurred. In the other trial one of 51 diet plus physical activity participants compared with none of 51 comparator participants experienced a serious adverse event (low-quality evidence). Cardiovascular mortality was rarely reported (four of 1626 diet plus physical activity participants and four of 1637 comparator participants (the RR ranged between 0.94 and 3.16; 3263 participants, 7 trials; very low-quality evidence). Only one trial reported that no non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke had occurred (low-quality evidence). Two trials reported that none of the participants had experienced hypoglycaemia. One trial investigated health-related quality of life in 2144 participants and noted that a minimal important difference between intervention groups was not reached (very low-quality evidence). Three trials evaluated costs of the interventions in 2755 participants. The largest trial of these reported an analysis of costs from the health system perspective and society perspective reflecting USD 31,500 and USD 51,600 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) with diet plus physical activity, respectively (low-quality evidence). There were no data on blindness or end-stage renal disease.One trial compared a diet-only intervention with a physical-activity intervention or standard treatment. The participants had IGT. Three of 130 participants in the diet group compared with none of the 141 participants in the physical activity group died (very low-quality evidence). None of the participants died because of cardiovascular disease (very low-quality evidence). Altogether 57 of 130 diet participants (43.8%) compared with 58 of 141 physical activity participants (41.1%) group developed T2DM (very low-quality evidence). No adverse events were recorded (very low-quality evidence). There were no data on non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, blindness, end-stage renal disease, health-related quality of life or socioeconomic effects.Two trials compared physical activity with standard treatment in 397 participants. One trial included participants with IGT, the other trial included participants with IGT, IFG or both. One trial reported that none of the 141 physical activity participants compared with three of 133 control participants died. The other trial reported that three of 84 physical activity participants and one of 39 control participants died (very low-quality evidence). In one trial T2DM developed in 58 of 141 physical activity participants (41.1%) compared with 90 of 133 control participants (67.7%). In the other trial 10 of 84 physical activity participants (11.9%) compared with seven of 39 control participants (18%) developed T2DM (very low-quality evidence). Serious adverse events were rarely reported (one trial noted no events, one trial described events in three of 66 physical activity participants compared with one of 39 control participants - very low-quality evidence). Only one trial reported on cardiovascular mortality (none of 274 participants died - very low-quality evidence). Non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke were rarely observed in the one trial randomising 123 participants (very low-quality evidence). One trial reported that none of the participants in the trial experienced hypoglycaemia. One trial investigating health-related quality of life in 123 participants showed no substantial differences between intervention groups (very low-quality evidence). There were no data on blindness or socioeconomic effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no firm evidence that diet alone or physical activity alone compared to standard treatment influences the risk of T2DM and especially its associated complications in people at increased risk of developing T2DM. However, diet plus physical activity reduces or delays the incidence of T2DM in people with IGT. Data are lacking for the effect of diet plus physical activity for people with intermediate hyperglycaemia defined by other glycaemic variables. Most RCTs did not investigate patient-important outcomes.

Falso hipertiroidismo franco por interferencia en inmunoanálisis / False overt hyperthyroidism by interference in immunoassay

No disponible

Use of communication technologies by people with type 1 diabetes in the social networking era. A chance for improvement.

AIMS: To evaluate the health-related use of Web 2.0 tools by patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey assessing views and usage of the Internet, Apps and Web 2.0. RESULTS: Number of participants: 289 (age 42.8±13.5 years; diabetes duration 18.4±12.2 years; 58.7% males; 39% with an upper secondary or higher education level). Web 2.0 usage for health purposes was low with 19.6% and 14% of Web 2.0 members (147; 50.9%) having health-related contacts and posting health comments. Health-related Apps were used by 35.4% of Smartphone owners (161; 55.7%). 75.3% patients would share information online with professionals, preferably through e-mail (78.7%) rather than Facebook (47.7%). 141 (66.5%) of those willing to share information would participate in a professional-moderated Facebook group. CONCLUSIONS: Web 2.0 and Apps usage for health purposes is low. The difference between the use of Web 2.0 networks and the willingness to participate in professional-moderated Web 2.0 groups points to the need of a higher implication of health professionals in promoting Web 2.0 technologies if these are to be adopted in a clinical setting. Currently, e-mail is the tool to be considered when aiming to increase online communication with patients with type 1 diabetes.

Parálisis hipopotasémica secundaria en adulto con hipertensión / Secondary hypokalemic paralysis in adult with hypertension

No disponible